Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,576,957 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.795. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 173.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $55,028, a difference of 7.9%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and median male earnings ($61,628 compared to $63,346, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $66,087, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $43,317, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $108,149, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 22.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.48%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.37%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.4%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (70.2% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.2%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).