Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Immigrants from Lithuania

Fair
Exceptional
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,022,535 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.750. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 204.1 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $108,149, a difference of 49.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $114,336, a difference of 46.9%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $96,836, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $43,317, a difference of 26.2%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $55,028, a difference of 27.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $66,087, a difference of 28.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
28.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 74.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and single male poverty (13.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 19.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Average
5.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (59.2% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.26%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 53.0%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 38.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 26.5%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.78%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%