Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,787,740 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 4.3 Immigrants from Lithuania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $51,361, a difference of 27.3%), wage/income gap (22.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $108,149, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $43,317, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $55,028, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $66,087, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.3%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.2%), male disability (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.7%).