Immigrants from Costa Rica vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,573,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 41.9 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $95,362, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $53,939, a difference of 2.5%), and median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $54,492, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $59,854, a difference of 0.010%), median family income ($101,354 compared to $101,856, a difference of 0.50%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $100,837, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and male poverty (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 5.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.31%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.0%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 9th grade (94.0% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 7th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.6%).