Russian vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 463,454,805 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.058. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 11.7 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $44,114, a difference of 20.5%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $101,856, a difference of 18.3%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $54,492, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,939, a difference of 0.83%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $39,698, a difference of 11.3%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.7%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 3.0%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (63.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 43.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.0%).