Immigrants from Guatemala vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,114,983 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 36.3 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $54,492, a difference of 17.8%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $44,114, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $95,362, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,939, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $59,854, a difference of 10.9%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.4%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.76%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and South American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.2%).