Crow vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,426,856 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.169% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 169.3 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,114, a difference of 39.0%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $86,824, a difference of 36.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $100,837, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,698, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,939, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,804, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 92.3%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 89.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 238.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 212.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 208.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.27, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 46.9%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.38%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.6%).