Immigrants from Denmark vs South American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,650,912 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.298% in South Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to a decrease of 298.2 South Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $44,114, a difference of 22.0%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $54,492, a difference of 18.6%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $101,856, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $53,939, a difference of 2.5%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $39,698, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($98,510 compared to $86,824, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.51%), single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.52%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.8%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.9%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and South American communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.44%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).