Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,435,595 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,969 compared to $124,429, a difference of 38.3%), per capita income ($42,563 compared to $58,353, a difference of 37.1%), and median household income ($80,972 compared to $110,428, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $56,835, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,447 compared to $72,963, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 33.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 23.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 29.8%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 90.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 96.2%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 80.0%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.2% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.25%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.4%), and hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 19.6%).