Immigrants from Belgium vs Ethiopian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,451,721 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Immigrant from Belgium communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belgium within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belgium corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Ethiopians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 33.0%), per capita income ($55,082 compared to $46,569, a difference of 18.3%), and median male earnings ($66,125 compared to $56,243, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,830 compared to $53,818, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($44,587 compared to $43,243, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,703 compared to $64,989, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.6%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.35%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 21.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.6%), family households (63.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.6%), professional degree (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belgium and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).