German Russian vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,468,742 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.894. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 178.1 Immigrants from Netherlands.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $50,458, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $111,982, a difference of 25.3%), and median household income ($75,856 compared to $94,411, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $41,870, a difference of 12.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $52,592, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 23.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.0%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.0%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.2%).