German Russian vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,381,870 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.284% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 284.3 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $48,749, a difference of 6.7%), and median household income ($75,856 compared to $78,682, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($93,858 compared to $94,472, a difference of 0.65%), median male earnings ($49,924 compared to $50,298, a difference of 0.75%), and per capita income ($40,266 compared to $39,827, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and family poverty (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.5%), college, under 1 year (65.4% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and college, 1 year or more (59.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.41%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and bachelor's degree (35.8% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.4%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.020%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%).