German Russian vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,427,471 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.895. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.468% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 468.2 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,266 compared to $50,065, a difference of 24.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $108,824, a difference of 21.7%), and median household income ($75,856 compared to $91,936, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 12.7%), median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $41,990, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $52,957, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 22.5%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple households (44.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.26%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.1%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.4%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%).