Central American vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,016,813 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $48,749, a difference of 8.0%), median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $50,298, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $38,028, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($78,803 compared to $78,682, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $91,385, a difference of 0.48%), and wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.22%), male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.8%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.6%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.9%).