Celtic vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,503,794 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 77.5 Immigrants from Northern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $54,159, a difference of 24.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $111,676, a difference of 21.1%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $121,840, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $54,571, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $69,003, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 22.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.62%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.080%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.0%).