Fijian vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,663,396 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.751% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 751.0 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $53,762, a difference of 5.6%), and median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $47,991, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,690 compared to $37,066, a difference of 1.0%), median household income ($74,205 compared to $72,959, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $85,414, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.6%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 39.7%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 9.6%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 106.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 66.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 31.6%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 227.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.82%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.9%).