Immigrants from Barbados vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,659,473 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Barbados communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Barbados within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Barbados corresponds to a decrease of 14.5 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (17.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 59.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,394 compared to $109,402, a difference of 22.4%), and median family income ($92,419 compared to $112,374, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,163 compared to $53,411, a difference of 0.47%), median female earnings ($41,685 compared to $41,373, a difference of 0.75%), and median earnings ($45,816 compared to $50,192, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 71.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 50.5%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.15%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.7%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 34.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.8%), married-couple households (39.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and currently married (40.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.12%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (63.2% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 237.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 81.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 60.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 72.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.9%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Barbados and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 49.1%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%).