Immigrants from Indonesia vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,091,871 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Indonesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Indonesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Indonesia corresponds to an increase of 79.1 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.2%), median household income ($97,297 compared to $92,029, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($43,412 compared to $41,373, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($60,935 compared to $60,388, a difference of 0.91%), median family income ($115,162 compared to $112,374, a difference of 2.5%), and per capita income ($48,195 compared to $49,412, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.23%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), college, under 1 year (68.9% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and college, 1 year or more (63.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Indonesia and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).