Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,516,990 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 21.1 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.4%), per capita income ($43,852 compared to $49,412, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $60,388, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,010 compared to $92,029, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $41,373, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $64,952, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.96%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.2%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.45%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 53.6%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.9%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.58%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.0%).