Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,895,541 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.087% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to an increase of 87.3 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $41,373, a difference of 9.6%), median earnings ($54,938 compared to $50,192, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($100,711 compared to $92,029, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $53,411, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $64,952, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.8%), single male poverty (11.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.6%), poverty (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and male poverty (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.6%).