Northern European vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,818,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 77.8 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,698 compared to $49,412, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $53,411, a difference of 3.4%), and median male earnings ($58,588 compared to $60,388, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $64,952, a difference of 0.46%), wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,870 compared to $109,402, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (48.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.90%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.7%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.0% compared to 69.1%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.42%).