South American Indian vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,973,305 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,171 compared to $119,094, a difference of 17.7%), median family income ($103,624 compared to $120,263, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $63,099, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $54,512, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $44,161, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 16.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.5%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%).