South American Indian vs Immigrants from France Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,133,683 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.763. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.054% in Immigrants from France. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 54.1 Immigrants from France.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,206 compared to $54,557, a difference of 23.4%), median male earnings ($54,508 compared to $63,715, a difference of 16.9%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $120,076, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,805, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $66,826, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($87,446 compared to $96,743, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (45.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.0%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (15.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from France communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.74%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%).