Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Yemen Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,791,038 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Yemen within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.958. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.670% in Immigrants from Yemen. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 669.8 Immigrants from Yemen.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,340 compared to $74,575, a difference of 31.9%), median household income ($84,011 compared to $65,194, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $73,043, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $34,693, a difference of 13.5%), median earnings ($46,333 compared to $39,540, a difference of 17.2%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 162.4%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 107.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 91.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 35.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 76.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 69.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 24.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 74.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 4.0%), family households (65.6% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 110.7%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 104.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 85.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 12.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 85.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 129.7%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 2.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and bachelor's degree (30.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Yemen communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.57%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 4.3%).