Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,233,752 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $80,863, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $47,981, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,376 compared to $37,970, a difference of 3.7%), median earnings ($46,333 compared to $42,923, a difference of 7.9%), and median family income ($97,958 compared to $90,450, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 31.2%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.54%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.3%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.2%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 75.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 54.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.6%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.9% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 42.2%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).