Kiowa vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,957,524 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $96,834, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $83,395, a difference of 26.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $91,624, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.73%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $38,528, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $57,919, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 55.3%), single father poverty (22.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and single male poverty (18.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.1%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 42.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.88%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 22.7%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.35, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.6%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 103.0%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.83%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 40.6%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.0%).