Costa Rican vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,931,622 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.787. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.151% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 151.0 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,638 compared to $52,121, a difference of 18.3%), per capita income ($44,090 compared to $39,608, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $94,138, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $52,621, a difference of 0.92%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $53,503, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($46,645 compared to $45,812, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 41.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.0%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.1%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 46.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%).