Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,096,291 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.442% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 442.1 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $102,190, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $55,615, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,657 compared to $47,925, a difference of 0.56%), per capita income ($44,509 compared to $44,187, a difference of 0.73%), and median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $40,704, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (60.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.6%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and bachelor's degree (40.4% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 12.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.40%), male disability (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.5%).