Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,594,181 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.062% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to a decrease of 62.3 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $61,843, a difference of 8.5%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $104,966, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $102,190, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,997 compared to $44,187, a difference of 0.43%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,611, a difference of 0.59%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 14.6%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.73%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 29.2%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 17.8%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%).