Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,351,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $104,966, a difference of 20.4%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $55,615, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $102,190, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $52,611, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $61,843, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 51.6%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 40.5%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.0%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.75%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.8%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.7%).