Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Dominica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,664,022 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominica within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.779. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Immigrants from Dominica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to an increase of 56.7 Immigrants from Dominica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 28.7%), householder income over 65 years ($62,330 compared to $50,071, a difference of 24.5%), and median family income ($94,429 compared to $85,411, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $37,825, a difference of 0.21%), median earnings ($43,393 compared to $42,420, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $50,301, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 45.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 39.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.8%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (61.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 92.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 60.0%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 32.6%), and no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 42.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 93.1%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 32.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 1.7%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Immigrants from Dominica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 101.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 48.9%), and male disability (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 2.2%).