Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Indonesia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Immigrants from Indonesia

Average
Good
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,985
SOCIAL INDEX
77.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
96th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Indonesia Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,045,942 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.526% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to an increase of 526.2 Immigrants from Indonesia.
Tsimshian Integration in Immigrants from Indonesia Communities

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $60,935, a difference of 24.8%), per capita income ($40,344 compared to $48,195, a difference of 19.5%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $51,715, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,649 compared to $55,521, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($39,530 compared to $43,412, a difference of 9.8%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Income
Income MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Exceptional
$48,195
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Exceptional
$115,162
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Exceptional
$97,297
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Exceptional
$51,715
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Exceptional
$60,935
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Exceptional
$43,412
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Exceptional
$55,521
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Exceptional
$107,627
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Exceptional
$113,519
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Exceptional
$66,694
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Fair
26.1%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 60.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 28.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and single female poverty (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Fair
12.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.8%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 165.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 78.6%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Tragic
33.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Good
82.9%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 52.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.21%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.59%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
27.7%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 10.6%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
21.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.2%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 68.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.4%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Fair
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Average
91.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Exceptional
63.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
51.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
17.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.4%

Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 115.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 73.2%), and hearing disability (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Indonesia Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianImmigrants from Indonesia
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Poor
47.8%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.4%