Tsimshian vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tsimshian
Navajo
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Tsimshian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,296,903 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 22.5 Navajo.
Tsimshian vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $66,529, a difference of 47.0%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $70,989, a difference of 43.0%), and median household income ($83,346 compared to $59,159, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $42,098, a difference of 16.0%), and median earnings ($43,695 compared to $36,999, a difference of 18.1%).
Income Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,344 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Fair $101,543 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,346 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,695 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,836 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Average $39,530 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,649 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,809 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,783 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,202 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 165.6%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 130.2%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 128.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.6%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 33.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 42.8%).
Poverty Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Poverty | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Good 13.1% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.2% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.8% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 104.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 67.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (16.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 15.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.3% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.5% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Tragic 8.2% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 16.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 88.7% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.8% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.4% | Tragic 72.8% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 47.2%), currently married (47.7% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 22.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (67.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.7% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.7% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.3% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 16.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.70%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.5%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%).
Education Level Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.8% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.3% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 57.9% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Tsimshian vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.8%), and female disability (16.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (32.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Tsimshian | Navajo |
Disability | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 59.2% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |