Nicaraguan vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,443,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 200.9 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($79,737 compared to $63,681, a difference of 25.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,554 compared to $74,257, a difference of 24.6%), and per capita income ($39,372 compared to $31,729, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,904 compared to $35,266, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $49,234, a difference of 10.6%), and median earnings ($43,026 compared to $38,707, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 90.5%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 87.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 247.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 241.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 238.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.2%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.82, a difference of 13.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (67.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 79.4%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.9% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 1.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and college, under 1 year (59.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 2.8%).