Malaysian vs Crow Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,765,551 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Crow.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 31.4%), median household income ($81,064 compared to $63,681, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $74,257, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $35,266, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $47,012, a difference of 9.8%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $38,707, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 102.7%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 84.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 78.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.6%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 233.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 232.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 231.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.82, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.91%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 43.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.69%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 68.8%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.59%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.2% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.89%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.2%).