Immigrants from Western Asia vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 388,299,723 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 56.9 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $38,560, a difference of 21.6%), median male earnings ($58,131 compared to $48,093, a difference of 20.9%), and median family income ($108,691 compared to $91,087, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $52,626, a difference of 0.84%), householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $56,321, a difference of 11.2%), and median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $36,492, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 22.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.34%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.6%), births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.41, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 50.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Central American communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.5%).