Immigrants from Western Asia vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,168,929 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.488. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 4.5 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,876 compared to $29,031, a difference of 61.5%), median family income ($108,691 compared to $70,989, a difference of 53.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $69,759, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $42,380, a difference of 23.2%), and median female earnings ($41,375 compared to $33,046, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 102.6%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 102.3%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 98.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 42.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 49.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 91.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 89.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.8%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (64.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 88.2%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 85.2%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 79.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.5%).