Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,818,547 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $44,509, a difference of 10.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $93,466, a difference of 7.9%), and median family income ($96,439 compared to $102,823, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $60,096, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,804 compared to $97,373, a difference of 2.7%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $85,025, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.7%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty (14.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.32%), currently married (43.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and high school diploma (87.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.0%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.5%).