Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Moldova Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,393,202 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Moldova within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Moldova. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Immigrants from Moldova.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $47,489, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $101,091, a difference of 16.8%), and median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $59,417, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $62,939, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $42,304, a difference of 7.7%), and median earnings ($45,030 compared to $50,274, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.8%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.8%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Moldova communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.58%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%).