Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,745,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to an increase of 9.1 Immigrants from Liberia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $38,165, a difference of 33.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,817 compared to $80,863, a difference of 32.1%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $37,970, a difference of 14.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $47,981, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $53,967, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 46.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.4%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 32.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.23%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 64.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.1%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.8%).