Immigrants from the Azores vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,245,528 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 34.5 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $64,658, a difference of 24.0%), per capita income ($39,608 compared to $47,698, a difference of 20.4%), and median family income ($95,402 compared to $110,635, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $51,678, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $40,491, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 66.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.9%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.40%), family households (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 92.6%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 84.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.1%).