Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Ukraine Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,010,447 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ukraine within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.145% in Immigrants from Ukraine. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 144.9 Immigrants from Ukraine.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $43,069, a difference of 11.2%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $48,134, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $61,163, a difference of 0.96%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $107,079, a difference of 5.6%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $109,645, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.72%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 20.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.48%), family households (64.6% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 89.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.5%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ukraine communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 46.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%).