Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Ethiopians
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 179,924,133 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 60.4 Ethiopians.
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 29.1%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $43,243, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,989, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $56,243, a difference of 1.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $96,824, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $103,736, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,806 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Average $103,273 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Average $84,965 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,658 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,382 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,738 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,224 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,070 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $101,387 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $60,581 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.90%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Poverty Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 8.0% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 20.0% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.8% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.4% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.3% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.9% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 12.5%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Excellent 64.6% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.0% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.3% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Poor 12.3% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.0% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.7% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 49.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Education Level Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.4% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.0% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.5% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechoslovakian vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.9%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Disability Metric | Czechoslovakian | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.0% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.6% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |