Russian vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,506,008 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 19.5 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $103,160, a difference of 7.0%), median family income ($120,487 compared to $113,229, a difference of 6.4%), and per capita income ($53,154 compared to $50,044, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.080%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $65,652, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $61,460, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.2%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.040%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.68%).