Immigrants from Latin America vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,887,034 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 1.1 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,823 compared to $50,044, a difference of 35.9%), median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $61,460, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($86,989 compared to $113,229, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,383, a difference of 0.010%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $41,825, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 57.7%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 57.4%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.0%), married-couple households (44.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (67.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 79.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 16.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%).