Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs South African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,290,403 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.261% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 260.9 South Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $109,719, a difference of 8.5%), median household income ($99,943 compared to $93,379, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,741 compared to $103,160, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,555 compared to $50,044, a difference of 1.0%), median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $61,460, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.3%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.59%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.5%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and South African communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.2%).