Lithuanian vs South African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
South African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

South Africans

Excellent
Excellent
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,851
SOCIAL INDEX
86.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
44th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

South African Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,015,325 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in South Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 16.2 South Africans.
Lithuanian Integration in South African Communities

Lithuanian vs South African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,383, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $109,719, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $61,460, a difference of 0.38%), median earnings ($50,991 compared to $50,752, a difference of 0.47%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $93,379, a difference of 0.51%).
Lithuanian vs South African Income
Income MetricLithuanianSouth African
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Exceptional
$50,044
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Exceptional
$113,229
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Exceptional
$93,379
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Exceptional
$50,752
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Exceptional
$61,460
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Exceptional
$41,825
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Poor
$51,383
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Exceptional
$103,160
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Exceptional
$109,719
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Exceptional
$65,652
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Lithuanian vs South African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Lithuanian vs South African Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianSouth African
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Excellent
15.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
10.0%

Lithuanian vs South African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.3%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.0%).
Lithuanian vs South African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianSouth African
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%

Lithuanian vs South African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Lithuanian vs South African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianSouth African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Fair
82.6%

Lithuanian vs South African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.3%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.91%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Lithuanian vs South African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianSouth African
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Excellent
30.5%

Lithuanian vs South African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Lithuanian vs South African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianSouth African
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.2%

Lithuanian vs South African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.3%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Lithuanian vs South African Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianSouth African
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Exceptional
69.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Exceptional
43.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
18.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Lithuanian vs South African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and South African communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.5%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Lithuanian vs South African Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianSouth African
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%