Fijian vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,380,030 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.991. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 34.1 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 34.0%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $50,878, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $91,956, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $34,802, a difference of 0.90%), householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,852, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($74,205 compared to $75,814, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.7%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 66.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and college, 1 year or more (51.3% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.17%), 11th grade (90.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and 10th grade (91.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.84%), female disability (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.6%).