Chilean vs Pakistani Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Pakistanis

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Pakistani Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,289,705 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 22.7 Pakistanis.
Chilean Integration in Pakistani Communities

Chilean vs Pakistani Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $45,587, a difference of 1.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $98,401, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $105,317, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $63,844, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,325, a difference of 0.26%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $40,596, a difference of 0.40%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Income
Income MetricChileanPakistani
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Excellent
$45,587
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$107,390
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$89,638
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$48,254
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Excellent
$56,719
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Excellent
$40,596
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$53,325
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Excellent
$98,401
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Exceptional
$105,317
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Exceptional
$63,844
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Fair
26.1%

Chilean vs Pakistani Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanPakistani
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.4%

Chilean vs Pakistani Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanPakistani
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Fair
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Chilean vs Pakistani Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanPakistani
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Excellent
37.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Average
82.8%

Chilean vs Pakistani Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.37%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanPakistani
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Excellent
64.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Good
47.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Chilean vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanPakistani
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
57.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Chilean vs Pakistani Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.1%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and high school diploma (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.020%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanPakistani
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Fair
97.5%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Good
89.6%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Excellent
86.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
67.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
61.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Excellent
48.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Excellent
39.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Excellent
15.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%

Chilean vs Pakistani Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chilean vs Pakistani Disability
Disability MetricChileanPakistani
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Average
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Fair
11.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Average
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Fair
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
2.4%