British West Indian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,950,351 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.167. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Immigrants from Pakistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 39.5 Immigrants from Pakistan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 50.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $114,434, a difference of 33.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $66,617, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $43,052, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $56,789, a difference of 9.5%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $51,693, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 71.8%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 41.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 40.7%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 39.8%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.30, a difference of 0.62%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (62.8% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 160.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 85.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 26.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 58.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 72.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.4%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.5%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Pakistan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 25.2%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.2%).